A Pair of Paintings That Act as Priceless Illustrations of a Difficult and Crucial Period in the Formation of Hungary's Identity
A Pair of Hungarian Oils, dating from 1698 and 1697
Oil on shaped canvases
Measuring: 148 ¼ x 55 inches; 145 ¼ x 52½ inches
Oil on shaped canvases
Measuring: 148 ¼ x 55 inches; 145 ¼ x 52½ inches
$750,000
‘Behold young men, see these
leaders, whom the House of the Batthyatids
sent around across the globe of Hungary’
‘Cerne
Viros, spectare Duces, quos misit im Orbem Hungaricum, Domus hac: BATHYANIANA.’
In Latin along the hem of the tapestry dated to 1698,
painted in yellow letters against a red background.
These two oil paintings, dated to 1697
and 1698, lie at the heart of Hungary’s political history towards the end of
the 17th Century and offer a poignant testimony of the complex dynamics that rent
the nation at that time. At first sight the oils differ substantially from each
other in theme and atmosphere: one, more peaceful and strongly religious,
depicts Saint Anthony of Padua joining the Franciscan order, and the other
(though not devoid of religious symbolism) spells out a far more political,
even military message, and calls for a unification of the Slavic states under
the leadership of Hungary. Nevertheless, a close study of the imagery,
symbolism and Latin texts scattered through the scenes reveals a shared desire
for Hungary’s national and religious independence. The pair, as they really
should be considered, are a priceless illustration of a difficult and crucial
period in the formation of the country’s identity.
A few years before the oils were
commissioned, Hungary was torn between the domination of two foreign powers,
the Austrian Empire in the West, ruled at that time by the Habsburg King
Leopold I, and the Ottoman Empire, led by Sultan Mehmed IV (and later by
Mustafa II) and his Grand Vizier Suleiman to the East. Most of central and
southern Hungary was occupied by Turkish forces (the region was called ‘Turkish
Hungary’ or ‘Ottoman Hungary’ for decades) and was only freed from the Ottoman
grip in 1697 with the great battle of Zenta, led by Eugene of Savoy. On the two
oils the dates 1697 and 1698 are painted in bright yellow, and it is difficult
to think that such self-conscious attention to the exact dates of the two oils,
and their obvious correspondence to the battle, are not a direct allusion to
that episode, though the name ‘Zenta’ itself cannot be found in the text.
Hungary’s
allegiances were divided, however, and if anything it was as anti-Austrian as
it was anti- Ottoman. The fragile state had learned the art of survival between
two giants, and used to its advantage the antagonisms between them.1 The people
of Hungary–the Magyars–wanted to be free from the control of both empires and
yet could shake off the domination of neither successfully.2 So their loyalties
vacillated, as they joined one power to drive out the other at one time and
later revoked that allegiance to befriend their previous enemy. Hungary lacked
a strong, unified government, and was ruled by powerful families of magnates
who exerted their leadership at a local level through counties or comitats,
and whose assemblies helped to keep alive the tenuous notion of a Magyar
nation. Such magnates included Adam Batthyany and Thomas de Nadasd, once a
personal favourite of King Leopold I of Austria but who later turned against
him and rallied Hungarian troops to help the Ottomans in the famous siege of
Vienna. The first of these commissioned the more military of the two paintings
(his latinised name Adamus Bathyan is signed on the oil). It is this work with which we shall
begin, despite its slightly later date. Thomas de Nadasd funded the more religious
painting: ‘Our illustrious Lord, count Thomas de Nadasd…had this made in 1697’3.
1 Spielman, John: Leopold I of Austria, 1977, Chap. 6, ‘The Zrinyi Rebellion and Repression in
Hungary’.
2 Miklos, Molnar: A concise History of Hungary, 2001. Chap. 3, ‘A country under three crowns’.
3
‘Illustrifsimus Doñus Doñus Comes
Thomas de Nadasd…Fieri Curavit 1697’.
Far left of the oil
The six armies of (from left to right)
Hungaria, Bosnia, Bulgaria, Gellitia, Transylvania, Dalmatia all with a bright
yellow star above name and standard. Hungary is at the forefront and its coat
of arms is replicated hanging on the trunk of the palm tree in the centre on
which the pelican has alighted.
Note: palm tree is symbol of victory and
Pelican is symbol of Christianity.
Far right of the oil
The five armies of (from left to right)
Dadomeria, Cumaria, Servia, Sclavonia, Croatia, all with a bright yellow star
above name and standard of each one.
I see eleven stars worshipping me.4
The central scene shows eleven armies
gathering under the protection and leadership of the Virgin Mary. She opens her
arms out to her ‘eleven stars’ in a maternal gesture, promising them security.
Each squadron brandishes its nation’s flag and coat of arms, and the country’s name
is painted in black above the ensigns, making the identification immediate and
clear. Over each name shines a bright yellow star. The squadrons form a
semi-circle beneath the Virgin, following the shape of the canvas, and from
left to right we can distinguish the armed forces of, first and foremost,
Hungary, then Bosnia, Bulgaria, Gellitia, Transylvania, Dalmatia, Dadomaria,
Cumaria, Serbia, Slavonia and finally Croatia.
At first sight this is a
rallying of European troops against the Ottoman forces; but the absence of
Austria from the gathering is significant. It is in fact an exclusively Slavic
gathering (apart from the Hungarians of course), for the Austrians, unlike all
the peoples depicted, are not a Slavic but a Germanic people, and this scene
points to the fundamental ethnic difference between them, a good reason to
reject Austrian rule. There is a strong message of rejecting Habsburg dominion
and a celebration of the united Slav nations, with Hungary in the lead. Beneath the Virgin’s feet a caption
reads ‘Patron of Hungary, under your leadership we seek refuge’5 which evokes
both notions of protection and of war, with ‘leadership’.6 This is not a peaceful appeal,
but a clarion-call for unity among the Slavic peoples. If we stretch the symbolism,
the Virgin is a personification of Hungary, guaranteeing her protection to all Slavs
united, celebrating their victory over the Ottomans at Zenta one year earlier
and asking them to shake off the Austrian yoke.
Hungary certainly saw itself at
the head of the revolt and its coat of arms and its emblem, the lion of
Hungary, recur at various points in the picture. On the right they are shown
together in a clever montage, where the lion himself brandishes the coat of
arms. The latter is also hung on the great Palm tree (left of the Virgin),
symbol of victory–the apposition makes it quite clear: Hungary has triumphed.
The lion features twice in the oil and undergoes an interesting change when it
reappears: whereas on the bottom left corner a rather small and timid-looking lion
hides in his cave, on the right, he has come out of the cave and stands proud
and defiant on top of it, fiercely holding the coat of arms of his nation. The
message seems to be along the lines of: ‘at first we were scared and weak, but
when the Slavs united, we grew strong and fierce and defeated our enemy and won
our freedom.’
The caption above the triumphant lion reads ‘In fluctu motuque simuldum vita supertes’, which translates into English as: ‘you [Hungary] have
survived through seas of troubles’.
4 Video
undecim stellas adorare me. Genesis 37
5 PATRONA
HUNGARIAE, sub tuum praesium confugimus.
6 ‘praesidium’.
The Evolution of the Lion of Hungary
On the far left of the oil, the Lion of
Hungary is represented hiding sheepishly in a cave, sword in mouth. The symbolf
of the Pelican feeding its young is repeated, nesting on the cave.
But to the
far right of the oil, the Lion has srpung triumphantly from his cave and stands
magestic on top of it holding the coat of arms of Hungary with pride. Over time
(understood as spacial across the oil) Hungary has overcome its hardships.
Latin: In fuctu motuque simul dum vita
supertes
Translation: you (Hungary) have survived
A Victory for Christianity
The Palm tree of Victory does not only
host Hungary’s coat of arms. In its upper foliage is perched a large white
Pelican, its chicks gathered around. The bird pierces its breast with its own
beak, and the drops of blood fall into the open mouths of its young (we find
the same image on top of the cave where the lion of Hungary is hiding). The
pelican, or sometimes cormorant, piercing its own breast to feed its heart to
its young is a symbol of Christianity, a metaphor of Jesus’ self-sacrifice to
humankind. This symbol, dominating the scene from the top of the Palm tree of
Victory is a unambiguous message of Christian victory over the Muslim Ottomans.
The caption above the scene reads: ‘I, the Pelican Adam Batthyany, feed these
young chicks in honour of my kingdom, fatherland, army and my people.’7 In a
caption below we read that Adam Batthyany is the one who funded the oil in
1698.8 He casts himself as a protector and leader, both religious and military.
The Batthyany are an old distinguished Hungarian magnate family, still in
existence to this day, that can trace their roots back to the foundation of
Hungary in 896. A branch of the family was Croatian and indeed a look back at
the position of the armies in a semi-circle beneath the Virgin shows that
Croatia is placed in a prominent position just as Hungary is, at the other tip
of the crescent formation (to the proper left of the Virgin). While the other nations
recede back into the canvas, Hungary and Croatia appear the largest, at the
forefront of the configuration. The seat of the Batthyany family is Güssing, on
the border between today’s Austria and Hungary. Now, Adam Batthyany, a
Catholic, founded a Franciscan monastery there in 1610–1659. The second
painting is precisely a scene of Saint Anthony joining the Franciscan order,
and these elements combine well to enforce the idea that these two oils are a
pair, perhaps made to hang in Adam Batthyany’s monastery in Güssing.
7 Nutrio
pullos hos, PELICANUS BATHYAN ADAMUS, Pro Regno, Patria, Milite, Gente
mea.
8 Excellentissimus
Comes Doñus Adamus de Bathyani…Croatiae, et Sclavoniae Camerarius,
Eques aurat ac Partium Regni
Hungariae… Suprem Generalis Fieri Curavit 1698 [Our most excellent master the Count Adam of the Battyanids,
Chairman of Croatia and Slavonia, golden Knight and Supreme General in his
native Kindom of Hungary, had this made in 1698].
The Pelikan (or
sometimes cormorant) piercing its own breast to feed its young: symbol of Christianity
represented nesting on the palm tree, symbol of victory-Christianity triumphs
over the Ottoman forces.
Latin
Nutrio pullos hos, PELICANUS BATHYAN
ADAMUS, Pro Regno Patria, Milite, Gente mea
Translation
I, the Pelican Adam Bathyani, feed these
chicks for my kingdom, my fatherland, my armies and my people.
The signature of Adamus of Bathyani
Latin
Excellentissimus Comes Donus Adamus de
Battliyann, perpetuus xx
Croatiae, et Sclavoniae Banus, Sacrae
Caesaree Regiae que Mattis intimus consiliarius Camerarius, Eques aurat ac
Partium Regni Hungariae, cis Danubianoru et Consimoru Canifienfium ?? Suprem,
Generalis etc etc Fieri Curavit 1698
Translation
Our most excellent master, the Count Adamus
of the Bathyadids, of the long line of the …
Chair of the council and ally of the kingdoms
of and sacred kings of Croatia, Slavonia; distinguished general of his native
counrty of Hungary, Supreme General of ...the Danube and... Took care to
commission this painting in 1698 As an
echo to the words of the Pelican opposite.
The Magyar Rebel Princes: the
siege of Vienna
As we have seen, Hungary’s allegiances
and loyalty wavered between the Austrian Habsburgs and the Ottomans in vain
attempts to free themselves from both or at least to gain more autonomy. When
the Turks besieged Vienna, they marched through Hungary and met little
resistance. Worse still, independent bands led by Hungarian rebel princes
joined them against the Austrians and there were few Hungarians to be seen
defending the ramparts of Vienna. One may wonder what had caused such hatred in
the Hungarian people that they became allies of the Muslims, against their
Austrian coreligionists.
Though relations had always been bitter since Emperor
Ferdinand of Austria took over Hungary and Bohemia in 1526, many historians
trace back the moment when relations seriously soured to the peace of Vasvar.9 In
the Spring of 1664, the Turks began an offensive into Hungary along the river
Raab. At first, confusion among the Austrian Imperial forces and the Hungarian
squadrons allowed the Turks to cross the river that marked the border. Panic
took over and disagreement was put to the side. A vigorous double-pronged
assault was launched against the Ottomans and unexpectedly brought victory to
the Austro-Hungarian troops. The Turks remained numerically superior but their losses
were far heavier. Above all, for the first time, the Hungarian and Croatian
nobility showed enthusiasm for the Habsburg cause and were prepared to do their
part in liberating the occupied portions of the realm.
Then, a few days later, just when
prospects were looking brighter and there was hope that a new-found harmony
would push out the Turks completely, Leopold I signed a peace treaty (the
Treaty of Vasvar) with the Ottoman pasha that gave him back Transylvania and
the parts of Hungary that had just been won back. As if this were not enough,
the treaty compelled Leopold to pay an annual gift of 200,000 Gulden to the
Sublime Porte. This strange decision on the part of the Habsburg Emperor is
partly explicable: at the very same time, the west side of his realm was being
attacked by French forces, led by Louis XIV.10 Knowing that he would soon be
forced to retrieve some Austrian troops from the east to come to the aid of the
western frontier, Leopold was anxious to consolidate a truce with the Turks.
But this was no satisfactory explanation for the Magyar nobles, who found themselves
once more under Ottoman rule. Many Magyar princes, like the Zrinyi brothers and
Thomas de Nadasd, former supporters of the Habsburg Emperor, decided to ignore
the truce with the Turks imposed upon them and openly defied the crown’s
appeasement policy.
9 Miklos, Molnar: A Concise History of Hungary, 2001. Chap. 3, ‘A country under three
crowns’.
10 Wolf, John: The Emergence of the Great Powers, 1685–1715, New York, 1951. Chap. 2,
‘The World War of 1683–1699’.
By Spring of 1670, the Magyar rebels
were ready. They had made dealings with the Turks and counted on their support
to openly defy the Austrian crown; protestant preachers in Upper Hungary were
even said to have given thanks that the Turks were free and willing to ‘rescue
Hungary from its oppression of papist slavery’.11 Leopold had little choice but
to answer their call for a military confrontation. The rebel princes should not
have trusted the Turks, who were far too concerned about keeping peace with the
Austrians to get involved and who did not come to their aid. The rebel princes
lost badly, and in April 1671, Nadasd was sentenced to death along with his
fellow conspirators. Over 2000 people were imprisoned in Hungary on suspicion
of rebellion. All their estates in Hungary, and Croatia were confiscated and
systematic attacks sought to eliminate all Protestant chapels from Hungary:
long years of harassment and persecution began for the disobedient counties. Political
and religious (Protestant) refugees fled to Ottoman-occupied Transylvania and Turkish
Hungary.
Whatever the reasons that drove them
into exile, these refugees took with them a deep hatred for the Austrians and
for any Magyar collaborators. Having very little to live from, the exiles
turned to raiding across the frontiers into their own, former, homelands–so
torn was Hungary in those years. But a decade later, the guerrilla bands of
homeless exiles were forged together once more, under the leadership of a 22
year old young man called Thököly, the handsome, well-educated and well-spoken
son of a Calvinist preacher. He was even supported by the Sublime Porte, who
saw in this young rebel a powerful tool of insurrection. In 1683, the Sultan launched an assault
on Vienna–via Hungary. The Ottoman army was supported by Tartars, the
Transylvanian Princes, Thököly and most Hungarians of the region. They besieged
Vienna for 60 days.
A coalition of Christian forces (the Polish, led by King
John III Sobieski and the Austrian Imperial army, under the Duke of Lorraine)
freed the capital after the day-long battle of Vienna. But the Turks were not
yet routed decisively, for King Louis XIV crossed the Rhine and marched into
the Holy Roman Empire. From there followed more than a decade of intermittent
war with France, which caused a lapse of attention to the Ottoman threat. That lapse
allowed the Turks slowly to take control again, capturing Belgrade in 1690.
The Habsburgs were finally rid of the
Turks thanks to the unparalleled, strategic brilliance of young Eugene of
Savoy.
11 Spielman, John: Leopold I of Austria, 1977, Chap. 6, ‘The Zrinyi Rebellion and Repression in
Hungary’.
Eugene of Savoy and the battle of
Zenta
Born in France to Italian Aristocrats,
Eugene was raised at the French court of Louis XIV. His mother, Olympia
Mancini, had grown up at the Palais Royal herself, along with the then young Louis,
and their intimate relationship often made people think they were lovers. When
Eugene was a teenager, he decided to embark on a military career, but the Sun
King refused the young Eugene permission to serve in the French army, judging
his physique too poor and better suited to church service. Around the same
time, Olympia Mancini fell out of favour at the French court and rumour had it
that she was involved in the unpleasant Affaire
des Poisons, a notorious plot against the King’s
life. She fled into exile and an embittered Eugene decided to pursue his dream
of a military career. He transferred his loyalties from Louis XIV to the service
of the Austrian Habsburgs. Leopold I never had a more faithful military
commander.
Eugene had distinguished himself and proved his loyalty to the
Austrian Habsburgs at the battle of Vienna; he was then serving under Baden.
During the long war with France, Eugene was not frustrated by issues of
allegiance and continued to serve the Imperial cause with zeal, even
complaining to his Imperial Majesty about his Austrian commander’s (count Caraffa)
lack of discipline. Leopold I was extremely impressed with the young man’s loyalty
and when Sultan Mustafa II marched on Transylvania in April 1697, Eugene was offered
supreme command of the Imperial forces. Abandoning all ideas of a defensive campaign
he moved fast to intercept the Turks as they crossed the river Tisza. He
launched a surprise attack and the Ottoman troops retreated in confusion to the
bridge, access to which became quickly overcrowded. For some 2000 dead and
wounded, Eugene inflicted 25,000 casualties on his enemy, annihilating the
Turkish army and driving the Ottomans out of the Austrian realm for good. He
also captured the army’s treasure and the Harem, and apparently some camels.
Eugene had shown his military and strategic genius, as well as his ability to
inspire trust and enthusiasm in his soldiers.
Scene at the feet of the Patron of Hungary.
Exerpt from Genesis 48: Jospeh brings his sons Manasseh and Ephraim to his Father Jacob.
John of Capistrano’s prophecy
Beneath the Virgin is a peaceful scene,
slightly separate from the military action taking place above. A long text
which takes up a large portion of the right hand wing of the canvas provides an
explanation. The first paragraph, an excerpt from Genesis 48
tells of Jacob’s prophecy about his grandson Ephraim. Joseph has brought his
two young sons, Manasseh and Ephraim, to his Father Jacob, so that he might
bless them. Jacob unexpectedly places his right hand on the youngest son’s
head, Ephraim, not on that of Manasseh, the eldest, as he duly should. Jacob
explains his gesture to the angered Joseph with this prophecy: Ephraim will grow
up to be a greater person than his elder brother, and so deserves his greater
favour.
The second paragraph of the text draws
a parallel between the biblical story above and a mirror anecdote, anchored in
Hungarian 15th century history: Johan Hunyadi, described as the leader of the
Kingdom of Hungary and the ‘Terror
Turcarum’ (literally the Terror of the Turks)
brings his two young sons, Ladislaus and Matthias to the Franciscan friar John
of Capistrano to be blessed. Again, strangely enough, the monk favours the
younger son, Matthias, over the elder. He gives Hunyadi this prophecy as an
explanation: whereas Ladislaus will be ‘snatched away by an untimely death’,
Matthias will grow to challenge Alexander the Great in virtue and
accomplishments. This explains the haloed friar’s crossed hands as he blesses
two children to the left of the scene and the Hungarian military accoutrements
of the father and children.
A brief historical introduction will
bring some clarification. John Hunyadi, a great Hungarian general, led a
crusade against the Turks at the siege of Belgrade in 1456, alongside the Franciscan
friar John of Capistrano, known as the ‘Soldier Saint’. The latter was in his
71st year. Johan Hunyadi’s eldest son Ladislaus died in childhood
and Matthias was crowned king in his place, in 1458, at the age of 14. He ruled
over Hungary and Croatia until his death in 1490. Again, this story points
again to the joint Croatian and Hungarian heritage that Adam de Batthyany is
keen to emphasise, and secondly, to his strong relationship with the Franciscan
church, adding weight to the theory that these oils were probably sponsored by
him in Güssing. The parallel with the biblical story, on the other hand, clearly
confers a divine and fated element on Matthias’ reign as well as on Hungary’s
victory over the Ottomans at Zenta.
Latin text accompanying the scene
Latin translation
Joseph brought his two sons, Manasseh and
Ephraim, to his Father Jacob so he may bless them, and Jacob rested his left
hand on Manasseh the older son and placed him to the right hand of the
fatherland, and rested his right hand on the head of Ephraim the younger son
and placed him to the left of the fatherland; but his left hand was on the head
of Manasseh. When Joseph saw that his Father had his right hand on the head of
Ephraim he was displeased and said to his Father: this will not do, this one
was first born, so place your right hand upon his head. The Father shaking his
head replied: know my son, I know, but although he will rejoin our people, his
brother, lesser in age will grow to be a greater person. In the Sacred text
Genesis 48.
In the memory of our Leader Johannes Hunyadi, who held sway over
the Kingdom of Hungary, and was the greatest fear of the Turks. Hunyadi came to
the saintly Father John of Capistrano, of the Religious order of the Seraphici,
a General in the Hungarian army and a cross-bearer during the war, so that he
may bless his two sons, famous Laudislaus and Mathias. He came and placed the elder
son, Laudislaus, to the right of the Saintly Father, and his younger son
Mathias to his left. Seeing this the Sacred Father switched them around and
placed his right hand upon the head of Mathias, the younger of the two, and his
left hand upon the head of Laudislaus the elder son. Johannes Hunyadi was
astonished and asked him why he was doing this. The Saintly Father answered
that Ladislaus would be snatched away from the Kingdol of Hungary by an
untimely death, and would not be able to serve the kingdom for long. Mathias on
the other hand, would rival in virtue and glory with Alexander the Great, ad
would soon teach all to be astounded by his accomplishments. So he did well.
1697 Hungarian Oil
Central scene on the second oil: the virgin
appears to Saint Athony of Padua of the Franciscan order.
Close-up opposite, he is recognisable for his
attributes: the lilies and the franciscan brown robes.
On top of crucifix with bleeding heart: INRI
: Jesus Nasarenus Rex Judaeorum.
Latin: Et habebat Angelus Mensuram ArundineamAuream.
Apoczt.
Translation: And the angel handed over to him
the golden rod.
Anthony of Padua and Thomas de
Nadasd
The Virgin Mary is once again central
to the scene in the 1697 oil. She appears to Saint Anthony of Padua to give him two
attributes, the Lily flower and what is described as ‘a golden rod’ (or reed), and to bless his
religious order, that of the Franciscans; Saint Anthony is dressed accordingly
in the brown robes and rope-belt of the order. An angel that has appeared at
the shoulder of the Saint hands over the attributes to him, and the caption, a quotation
from St John’s Apocalypse, reads ‘and the angel gave him the golden reed’.12 The
text to the far left, inscribed on an elaborately decorated cartouche, relates
the story represented on the canvas and explains that after the apparition
Saint Anthony spread the word to his people (presumably the followers of the
Franciscan order is meant) that they had the Virgin’s favour and love. The
picture is dominated by the bleeding heart of Jesus, adorned with a golden
crown and transfixed by a sword on which Jesus is crucified. Above his crown of
thorns are painted the initials I. N. R. I., which stand for Jesus Nasarenus
Rex Judaeorum (Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews).
Although very different in
theme and atmosphere from the 1698 piece, the oil presents also some striking
similarities, which suggest that the two were made as a pair and that this more
peaceful and religious work is a counterpart and complement to the more political
and military. In both, the Virgin is central to the scene and in both assures
the people of her support, love and favour (to the Hungarian and Slavic cause
in the first, to the Franciscan order in the second). Then, prominence is given
to the Franciscan order, with the blessing by the Franciscan Friar, John of
Capistrano, of Hunyadi’s two sons in the 1698 oil, and Saint Anthony’s central
importance in the 1697 piece. That oil goes further and assures Mary’s special
favour for the religious order. Historically, the Batthyany family’s strong
link to the Franciscans (Adam of Batthyany, the commissioner of the oils, had a
Franciscan monastery built in his home town), can explain this emphasis.
Finally, the huge bleeding heart of Jesus that dominates this second scene is
echoed in the later oil by the Pelican’s piercing of its own breast to feed its
young, a symbol of Jesus’ sacrifice for humankind.
The signatures, too, are
executed in the same manner, with the twice-repeated contraction Comes Doñus
Doñus for ‘Comes Dominus’ (the Count and master), and the phrase ‘Fieri Curavit’
(had this made). Both Adam Batthyany and Thomas de Nadasd were rebel princes with
affiliations in Croatia and in Hungary. Thomas de Ndasd was killed by the
Imeprial troops when he attempted insurrection against Habsburg rule in 1671,
over twenty-five years before the oil was commissioned. We may conclude
therefore, that Adam Batthyany or a descendant of Thomas de Nadasd (perhaps
with the same name) commissioned the oil in his honour and signed his name in
his memory. Beneath the dedication, in the very far right bottom corner of the
canvas is a second ‘signature’: the splendid Nadasd coat of arms, a white-collared
black duck, flanked by two bulrushes.
12 ‘Et
habebat Angelus Arundineam Mensuram auream. Apoc. 21’
Text to the far left, describing the central scene
Translation of the Latin
The pure and sacred Virgin Mary appeared to
Saint Anthony of Padua, of the religious order of Saint Francis. She said to
him: Anthony, these are banners, that I myself have carried up to this day in
my heart. My dearest son Jesus Christ, who was crucified for the whole of
humankind, kept these banners in his home, and this very home was saved from
all fires and plagues and was free of demons. Saint Anthony spread the word
among the faithful, that the Virgin Mother Mary from Padua had appeared to him,
and in this one appearance had assured them of her sacred love blessed him with
the religious order.
Signature of the oil, bottom right, to the
left of the coat of arms
Translation of the Latin
Our most glorious master, glorious Count
Thomas of Nadasd, from the long line of the Forgaras, golden kight of the
sacred Kingdom, Keeper of the Coucil of Mattis. He took the care to commission
this in 1697
Coat of arms of Thomas de Nadasd, far right
bottom corner, as a second signature, a white-collared black duck flanked by
two bull-rushes
Comments
Post a Comment